my review on:
CHALLENGES OF THE GLOBAL
INFORMATION SOCIETY
(Pekka Himanen)
Himanen is this
papers talks about the challenges facing new(?) information society.
He first describes current tends and changes in the societies
(specially in europe) and then mentions some of biggest challenges
that these societies face currently as well as some predictions based
on these trends for the future. His main point is to alert people and
politicians to the importance of change in plans and politics to cope
with new era and its properties.
He sees the
information society growing and traditional societies change based on
observation of these cultural/economic trends: task and labor
balances change, new industries emerge, growing importance of culture
in societies, population ages and pressures on the welfare state
increases,...
then, in search for
a sustainable development policy, he explores different development
scenarios from around the world. And compares The main 3 competing
ones and the social models behind them.
The three models
are:
1.“Silicon Valley
model”(for example in USA)
2.“Singapore
model”(india and china)
3.“Finnish
model”(European countries)
then he mentions
problems concerning each model:
Silicon Valley
model-->it leaves the weak behind (high social price)
Singapore
model-->there is always others in this “race to the bottom”
and if it is not paired with promoting innovation, it will fail in
longer run.
Finnish model-->it
is passive and can lead to a “society of envy”
since author is
focused on european countries, he explores the changes necessary in
“Finnish model”.
He proposes a
combination of welfare state and the information society, to achieve
this several values play important role:
1.caring or equal
opportunities for everyone
2.confidence
3.communality or
including others and willingness to do things together
4.encouragement or
sense of open opportunities to do or have anything
5.freedom of choice
and action unless it harms others
6.creativity
7.courage
8.visionariness
9.balance
10.meaning
and 4 key concept
that important for a sustainable social development:
1.A creative
economy
2. A creative
welfare society
3. Humanly
meaningful development
4. A global culture
to compete with
cheap asian market a creative economy is necessary. This economy is
empowered by culture, strong it sector and good welfare system. The
areas related to innovation should receive more attention and
investment in R&D activities should increase. During the process
we should have in mind that innovation doesn't progress in linear
fashion. Promotion of creativity can be done in several levels of
government, society and companies with different methods such as
importing it to the work culture and promoting cooperation.
Welfare becomes very
important specially by aging population. He suggests the notion of
“welfare society” rather than “welfare state”: using
non-governmental providers in some (welfare related)sectors while
keeping some(minimal) other to government only, can create an open
competition and work toward the interest of citizens.
To maintain the
welfare society we need new ways of promoting a socially, mentally,
physically and culturally balanced development.
Social balance based
on self fulfillment and belonging to an enriching community can be
reached by means of a good work culture.
Preventing
exhaustion and work-leisure balance are vital for a creativeness.
Current “culture of emergency” is totally agains these goals and
exhausts people.
Himanen's solution
to make a balanced work-life plan consist of:
flexible working
hours, project work, concept of “working time bank” and flexible
off times based on personal needs.
He claims that
having a successful information society is based on high-quality
eduction system and open information infrastructure.
Mental and physical
balance are other important concepts for the success of the
information society. Continues stress and low physical activity, the
outcomes of new work and life style, endanger people's health and
need planning to encourage individuals to adopt healthy and active
lifestyle.
He proposes
migration as a mean to build a more creative society with importing
new cultural elements and also to avoid aging population. Attracting
foreign students, making a welcoming society and good integration
plans are key points for success of this plan.
.
.
.
some thoughts on this paper:
-the paper gives a good overview on the current situation and challenges of information society and points many multi-dimensional workaround.
-the solutions he propose are totally based on europe's platform, he does not address the global sustainable system, but more an European system to survive the new wave and compete with others even with the price of ignoring human rights and other's well-being. it is not an international cooperation.
-solutions and points he makes are very vague in some parts. some parts has some detail of implementation in real context but some stays in very theoretical level.
-the outcome and drawbacks of many of these suggested actions are not pointed out and mentioned.